Microphones for nature recording II.: different microphones for different situations

Here I present some examples of microphones and related equipment to use for different recording situations. This is not an endorsement of any products, but rather examples to give you an idea of where to start your research. Note that I have only included microphones suitable for field recording, and I have not included USB mics, as most are designed for studio recording.  For a background on microphone types and arrays, click here.

Single species recording.

For recording single species, you generally want to limit the sounds to the side and rear of the microphone. This is what shotgun mics are made for, but as mentioned previously, shotguns are not zooms, but allow better focus. If you need to zoom in on a sound, you need a parabolic dish (see below). Shotgun mics tend to be very sensitive to wind, so they need some form of wind protection.

Examples of shotgun mics commonly used by field recordists include Rode NTG-1, Rode NTG-2, Rode NTG4+, Sennheiser MKE 600, Sennheiser MKH416, Audio Technica AT 875R, and Schoeps CMIT 5.   Recently, Rycote released a couple of shotgun mics that are getting good reviews, the HC-15 and the HC-22.

The most common commercially-available parabolic microphones are made by Telinga and Wildtronics. Telinga parabolas are made in Sweden and feature several kinds of microphones (omni, cardioid, and M-S), or can be fitted with your own mics. In addition, the mics can be removed from the parabola and used as a regular field mic. Wildtronics parabolas are made in the USA, and come with mics built in, available either in supercardioid mono or M-S stereo.  Dodotronics also has parabolic microphones, available in mono or stereo.

It is also possible to make your own parabola, and instructions are available on the internet. A couple of things to keep in mind: frequency enhancement by the parabola depends on the diameter of the dish – lower frequency sounds require a larger dish. For a 1 kHz sound, you need a dish at least 1 foot in diameter; for a 500 Hz sound, it needs to be 2 feet or more. Using an omni mic within the parabola allows for a lower frequency response than using a shotgun mic. Lastly, the material the dish is made out of may “color” the recording. They will also need wind protection.

Soundscape recording

Soundscape recording is typically done in stereo. As mentioned in the previous section on microphone arrays, there are many ways of setting up microphones to capture a stereo image. Things to note here are the polar patterns, the self-noise of the microphone, and making sure the microphone is sturdy enough for outdoor use.

XY, or coincident mics, include Audio Technica AT2022, Audio Technica BP4025, Audio Technica AT8022, and Rode NT-4:

In general, a 90 degree XY configuration can be a little narrow for soundscape recording and requires careful placement.  Some XY mics can be adjusted up to 120 degrees, which creates a more spacious feel.

Any matched pair of cardioid condenser mics can be rigged in an XY configuration; some good possibilities are include Rode NT55, Rode M5, Shure KSM 137, Shure KSM 141, Sennheiser MKH8040:


Mid-Side (M-S)
recording includes two different microphones, a cardioid or hypercardioid and a figure 8. A couple microphones include both in one package, such as the Audio Technica BP 4029, Sennheiser MKH 418S, the Sanken Short M-S mic, the Shure VPV88, and the Sony ECM 680S:

Recordists will often piggyback a shotgun with a figure 8. Some of the most popular combinations include pairing the Sennheiser MKH 30 figure 8 with the MKH 8060, or the Schoeps MK 41 with the MK8:

Omni mics can be configured in a variety of spaced pair arrays to record some great stereo effects, with some of the more popular being variations of the “Olson wing” and partially baffled boundary (also known as Stereo Ambient Sampling System, or SASS). For Olson wing arrays, the Audio Technica AT4022 has been very successful. Partially baffled boundary arrays have done well with Sennheiser omni mics, such as the MKH 8020 , the DPA 4040, and inexpensive EM272 electret capsules.  Note that the Audio Technica AT4022, while a lovely sounding mic, is sensitive to humidity and sudden temperature changes.

 Sound samples using different mics and arrays

AT2022 (XY) fed into a Sony PCM-M10 (see section on recorders here) with a Felmicamps SK3.5 preamp:

AT4022s (omnis) in Olson wing configuration, fed into Fostex FR2LE:

Sennheiser MKH20s (omnis) in partially baffled boundary array, fed into a Sound Designs 722:

omni arrays

Simplified graphical depictions of two different stereo arrays for omni mics.  Each could be made from wood or foam, and would be mounted on a tripod and covered with a windscreen.

Bernie Krause has successfully used omni lavaliers placed on either side of trees to simulate a binaural recording (“tree ears”).  Examples of lavs that might be used this way include the Audio Technica 803b, the Sennheiser MKE-2, or the DPA 4060.  The Primo EM-272 capsules also work well in this configuration.

Ultrasonic recording

Ultrasonic recording (above 20 kHz) often requires special gear, usually referred to as bat detectors. But there are full spectrum recorders available; in addition, some professional recorders can record up to almost 100 kHz. I cover the details in Options for recording ultrasounds.

Contact mics

Contact mics are used to sense vibrations. These are usually piezoelectric transducers, the same kind used to amplify guitars and violins.  They are pretty easy to construct from cheap Piezo disks, or they can be purchased online, made specifically for nature recording:

https://hydrophones.blogspot.com/

Contact instrument microphones (guitar or violin pick-ups) can also be used to detect outside vibrations, but it should be noted that their housing is not made to stand up to the elements, and they come with a ¼” plug and may need an adapter for some field recording equipment.

Hydrophones

Hydrophones are used to sense sounds underwater, which are transmitted via vibrations, so they are, in essence, contact microphones. Specialty hydrophones used in research on whales and dolphins, such as the Ambient Recording ASF-1, may run more than a thousand dollars, although the company listed above carry hydrophones for much less cost.

If you’re adventurous, there are a number of YouTube videos on how to make DIY hydrophones for under $50, but they won’t be as sensitive as the ones listed above.

Videography

Getting decent location sound to go with nature videos can be difficult, and may be why so many documentaries rely on music for audio tracks. But adding a shotgun mic, a stereo mic, or lavaliers can greatly enhance the quality of audio for a video production.

Because the videographer (or producer) usually wants to capture sound in front of the camera, shotgun mics are the standard, either camera mounted or handled separately on a boom pole. Rode, Audio Technica, and Sennheiser make mics that attach to a cameras hot shoe and plug straight into the cameras audio jack (if it has one) – be sure to check the type of connector your camera has.  Examples of some video mics include Rode stereo video mic pro, Rode video mic NTG hybrid, Sennheiser MKE 400, Sennheiser MKE 200, and Shure VP83F:

There are a great number of video mics made for attaching to the camera (or in some cases, your cell phone).  Most of these are short shotguns, and may not have the isolation of some longer shotguns, but they have the advantages of being easier to use and less expensive.

Using microphones away from the camera, fed into a separate recorder is more complex, but also allows for higher quality microphones and more flexibility in microphone placement, although syncing audio and video may be tricky. Tascam makes the DR60D MKII, DR 701D and DR 70D recorders that sit between the camera and tripod, allowing synchronous high quality recording.  The recently released Zoom F4 (and F8), and Sound Devices Mixpre-3 ii (and 6 ii) are also designed to work in this capacity.

Commonly used shotgun mics for videography include the Audio Technica AT875R and AT897, the Rode NTG-1, the Rode NTG-5, and the Sennheiser MKE 600, and MKH 416:

For a greater sense of ambiance, a stereo mic can be added separately, or a stereo shotgun mic can be used. See the examples under “Mid-side” above.

Adding microphones for dialog can be done using shotguns or lavs (which also allow wireless options). But that technically isn’t nature recording and there are already plenty of references on that topic.

Why do microphones vary so much in price?

Some of it is, of course, the name.  But with microphones, paying more generally means less noise from the mic itself, a higher dynamic range, a better build quality, and perhaps a better warranty.  I know of people who have been using expensive Sennheisers in the field regularly for decades.   Different mics of the same class sound a little different to different people – like cameras, some seem warmer, some cooler.  If possible, listen to various microphones and talk to people who have used them before investing.

I hope this material has been helpful in describing the different types of microphones and their uses.


Last modified January 2023.

 

34 thoughts on “Microphones for nature recording II.: different microphones for different situations”

  1. Brandon Thipphavong

    Hey there!

    Hi im totally new to microphones and recording. I wanted to record nature sounds outside of my balcony for sleep, relaxing…etc. The sounds coming from my balcony are directly in front of me as behind me is a wall. I wanted your opinion on what I should get for that type of audio recording. I dont want to break the bank but if its reasonable then will do.

    Thank you for your time 🙂

    1. Hi Brandon, you might start with a small recorder that has built-in mics. Examples include the Tascam DR-05X or Zoom H5. Both are pretty inexpensive, but will give you an idea of how good your balcony will be for recording. Both also allow you to add external mics down the road, which may improve the sound quality some. Hope that helps, Chris

  2. Hi Christine, I have really appreciated the posts you’ve made on soundscape recording and they have been super-helpful, thank you.

    Wondering if I could possibly ask what setup you would recommend for soundscape recording of waves…?

    I’ve tried with a Olsen wing style setup (2x EM272 Omni’s recorded into a Zoom F6), which does capture a good stereo image with fantastic detail, but I feel like everything is the same volume “level” in the mix, if that makes sense? To the ear, the waves themselves were significantly louder than the ambient sound of the water receding and the bubbles etc, but as recorded, everything seems basically at the same volume level, which means the waves don’t sound distinct and are “drowned out” by those ambient other sounds. In general, the mic’s are super sensitive, and do have very low self noise, as does the Zoom F6, but it does seem prone to picking up everything at a similar volume level, regardless of what the actual volume level was…

    I’m wondering if different microphones might help with this, either a different type of omni, or some cardioid’s? I am completely new to this so hope you wouldn’t mind me just outright asking before I make another investment into some different Mic’s…

    This is an example of what I’m referring to…

    https://soundcloud.com/far-landscape/1-hour-of-the-waves-on-vatersay-outer-hebrides-scotland?si=b73578a40fc94c7985ac61140e84f4de&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

    1. Hi James, I really like your recording, even if it lacks a little dynamic range. I don’t think the problem is with the particular mics, but rather placement and number of mics. Ocean shores are a perfect example of how we hear differently than a microphone records. Next time you go out, spend a bit more time listening. Put your ears down by the sand, both close to the waves and further away. Then stand up and notice how different the sound is just a couple of meters above the sand. Stand next to a headwall, rocks, jetties, or anything solid and notice how they reflect the sound. All of these different sounds combine in our heads to create an ocean experience, but the mics tend to pick them up separately. So you may need mics in each location in order to create the sound you are looking for. You might have to experiment with different arrays besides the Olson Wing in different locations (I’ve not recorded the ocean with an Olson Wing, so I don’t know how it will respond in each location). Make sure you don’t have any lo-cut filters on. I hope this helps and I look forward to more recordings!

      1. Hi Christine, I just wanted to say, thank you so much for your very kind reply. I’ll try a few different array configurations and positions before I go for different mics.

  3. Hi Christine.
    I am in Africa and want to record birds, frogs, wild animals like lions and just the forest sounds at times.

    I am starting from scratch.

    What equipment would you recommend I start with to achieve a good quality recording.

    Thanks
    Joan

    1. Hi Joan,
      Sorry for the delay in responding, I’m on a recording trip with little communications.
      What equipment you pick depends on your budget, what you intend to use the recordings for, and whether you want something quick and easy, or are willing to tackle the steep learning curve to deal with professional gear. Review the pages on the equipment section of my blog, and maybe that will help you get started.
      I went on a photo safari to Tanzania many years ago, and vividly remember the sounds. I hope to go back someday with my recording gear. You have some great material to work with!
      Chris

  4. Hi Christine, I have a Zoom H5 and I’m thinking about getting additional microphones for XY setup. Do you have experience with pair of Rode M5 or Rode NT5 compacts? Thank you

  5. Pingback: Research portfolio – Rainbow Rose Oldfield

What do you think?

Translate »